A discursive formation that undermined integration at a historically advantaged school in South Africa

Authors

  • Devika Naidoo University of the Witwatersrand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38140/pie.v28i2.23

Keywords:

Integration, Code, Boundaries, Discourse, Discursive formation, Regularities

Abstract

This paper provides an analysis of the extent of integration at a historically advantaged school. A qualitative multi-method case study allowed for in-depth analysis of integration in the school. Bernstein’s theory of code, classification, boundary and power framed the study. Data analysis showed that: racial desegregation was achieved at student and level one staff level and lacking at management and administrative staff level; staffing integration was minimal; institutional culture integration was not evident; social boundaries enacted maintained previous race based power relations; weaker boundaries between instrumental and non-instrumental forms of knowledge legitimised students’ experiences and interests but did not facilitate access to non-instrumental forms of knowledge and thinking; the dominant discursive frame of teachers was one of student deficit. These regularities point to a discursive formation (Foucault, 1977) that undermine integration and would reproduce previous racialised inequalities. Finally, an explanation of the discursive formation is touched on followed by recommendations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##submission.downloads##

Published

2010-06-30

How to Cite

Naidoo, D. (2010). A discursive formation that undermined integration at a historically advantaged school in South Africa. Perspectives in Education, 28(2), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.38140/pie.v28i2.23

Issue

Section

Research articles