Technology inclusion for students living with disabilities through collaborative online learning during and beyond a pandemic

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38140/pie.v40i1.5307

Keywords:

Collaborative online international learning, COVID-19 pandemic, Inclusive technologies, Open distance learning, Strategic policy framework on disability, Students living with disabilities

Abstract

Technology-based platforms in higher education institutions (HEIs), including online learning, require innovative approaches to ensure inclusive and transformative educational spaces for students living with disabilities. Achieving social equality, technology access and inclusion may contribute to ensuring a seamless instructional design for students living with disabilities in HEIs amid and beyond COVID-19. COVID-19 has obliged HEIs to adopt alternatives to learning and teaching, making the use of open distance learning (ODL) amid the pandemic more relevant. This theoretical paper considers the significance of ODL by demonstrating how to achieve technology inclusion for students living with disabilities through collaborative online international learning (COIL). Situated within the collaborative learning theory, this paper offers a disability perspective to learning in HEIs, through an analysis of stipulations in the Strategic Policy Framework on Disability for the Post-School Education and Training System (2018). The findings indicate that the application of COIL for students living with disabilities may transform their learning experiences and unlock new pathways for their development. The paper recommends that COIL may be used as a response to ensuring access and inclusive education provision for students living with disabilities in HEIs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##submission.downloads##

Published

2022-03-04

How to Cite

de Klerk, E. D., & Palmer, J. M. (2022). Technology inclusion for students living with disabilities through collaborative online learning during and beyond a pandemic. Perspectives in Education, 40(1), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.38140/pie.v40i1.5307