The acceptability of concrete block construction in low cost housing in the Cape Peninsula
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38140/as.v9i2.2001Keywords:
End-user satisfaction, concrete block construction, low cost housing, materialsAbstract
This article presents the findings of a research project examining the acceptability of concrete block construction for low cost housing in the Cape Peninsula in terms of materials and execution. Data were collected by means of a questionnaire survey in which residents of low cost housing were interviewed. In addition, personal and telephonic interviews were conducted with key stakeholders from the construction industry involved in the delivery of low cost housing. The findings indicate that concrete block construction is being used extensively for low cost housing developments in the Cape Peninsula, owing to its defining characteristics such as ease of construction, affordability, durability, speedy delivery and acceptance. End-users are generally satisfied with the construction material used for the wall structure of their current houses. They are, however, dissatisfied with the workmanship of the construction, as they feel that problems such as cracking and damp have arisen because of hurried and incomplete construction. The endusers are aware that the wall structures are not plastered, but only bagged. Even without any formal or technical knowledge of building houses, they state that they should be involved in the planning and construction stages of their new homes with regard to funding and appearance in order to make these homes more affordable and acceptable. Despite a lack of technical knowledge of concrete technology, the respondents felt that the concrete block was the· most acceptable form of construction material available for wall structures because of its perceived strength and durability.
Downloads
##submission.downloads##
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Publishing rights: Copies maybe uploaded to institutional repositories. Disclaimer: Views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s). Publication thereof does not indicate that the Editorial Staff or the University of the Free State accept responsibility for its content.