From the editor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38140/trp.v16i0.3153Abstract
In the search for a clarification of the legitimate boundaries of the professional's sphere of expertise, is an underlying conviction that the profession could and indeed should, within the ambit of the accepted holistic view of planning, be concerned with social form and norms. As planning does not occur in a vacuum it is clear that societal issues are an integral part of environmental planning. The "Generalist/Specialist" dichotomy can be explained to an extent by what can be regarded as a degree of 'diffusion' taking place in our traditional role in society: a role which previously placed great store on resolving problems in terms of the physical attributes of Space and Place. However, change and the scale and rate of change have necessitated a strengthening of the third component of the planner's role, namely the study of Process.
Downloads
##submission.downloads##
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Publishing rights: Author(s) may upload a second copy to institutional repositories. Disclaimer: Views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s). Publication thereof does not indicate that the Editorial Staff or the University of the Free State accept responsibility for it.