An ordeal of the real: shame and the superego

Authors

  • Prof J Barnard-Naudé University of Cape Town, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18820/24150479/aa53i1.1

Keywords:

shame, superego, ego-ideal, death drive

Abstract

This essay argues that the renovation of a discourse of shame in late capitalist society requires revisiting the conventional Freudian literature on shame from a Lacanian point of view. The argument holds that shame is a subjective manifestation of a complex dialectics between the ego-ideal and the superego. The essay extends the Lacanian notion that shame is felt in relation to an “Other prior to the Other”. Under the dialectical pressure of the ego-ideal, the superego, it is argued, plays a paradoxical but ineliminable role in the production of shame. In the concluding parts of the essay, I tease out the radical socio-political consequences of a renovated Lacanian discourse of shame. Correlated to the death drive, shame offers an escape from the capitalist symbolic order’s predeterminations and pre-assigned identifications. As such, shame is designated not only as the telos of psychoanalysis, but also as the original and originary ethical relation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed S. 2004. The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Ahmed A and Semple K. 2019. Photo of drowned migrants captures pathos of those who risk it all. New York Times. 25 June. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/25/us/father-daughter-border-drowning-picture-mexico.html [accessed on 2 June 2021].

Arendt H. 1998. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Barnard-Naudé J. 2020. We must be able to get used to the Real. Philosophy & Rhetoric 53(3): 271- 224.

Bracher M. 1988. Lacan’s theory of the four discourses. Prose Studies 11(3): 32-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/01440358808586349

Copjec J. 2006. May ’68, the emotional month. In: Žižek S (ed). Lacan: the silent partners. London: Verso.

Copjec J. 2007. The descent into shame. Studio Art Magazine 168: 59-80.

Evans D. 1996. An introductory dictionary of Lacanian psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.

Filipovic Z. 2017. Towards an ethics of shame. Angelaki 22(4): 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2017.1406050

Freud S. 1961. Civilization and its discontents. In: Freud S (ed) The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud Volume XXI (1927-1931). Transl J Strachey. London: Vintage Books.

Ginzburg C. 2019. The bond of shame. New Left Review 120: 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1353/col.2019.0020

Guenther L. 2011. Resisting Agamben: the biopolitics of shame and humiliation. Philosophy and Social Criticism 38(1): 59-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453711421604

Holmes A. 2015. That which cannot be shared: on the politics of shame. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 29(3): 415-423. https://doi.org/10.5325/jspecphil.29.3.0415

Huang T. 2009. The importance of making ashamed: regarding the pain of (animal) others. Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies 35(2): 103-145.

Lacan J. 1938. Family complexes in the formation of the individual. Transl C

Gallagher. Available at: http://www.lacaninireland.com/web/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/FAMILY-COMPLEXES-IN-THE-FORMATION-OF-THEINDIVIDUAL2.pdf. [accessed on 3 June 2021].

Lacan J. 1988. The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book I: Freud’s papers on technique 1953-1954. Miller J-A (ed). Transl J Forrester. New York: W.W. Norton.

Lacan J. 1991/2007. The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XVII: The other side of psychoanalysis. Miller J-A (ed). Transl R Grigg. New York: W.W. Norton.

Lacan J. 2015. The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VIII: Transference. Transl B Fink. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Lewis HB. 1971. Shame and guilt in neurosis. Psychoanalytic Review 58(3): 419-438.

Lexico. 2021. Definition of sanction. Available at: https://www.lexico.com/ definition/sanction [accessed on 5 February 2021].

McGowan T. 2004. The end of dissatisfaction? Jacques Lacan and the emerging society of enjoyment. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Miller J-A. 2006. On shame. In: Clemens J and Grigg R (eds). Jacques Lacan and the Other Side of Psychoanalysis: Reflections on Seminar XVII. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 11-28. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387602-002

Piers G and Singer MB. 1953. Shame and guilt: a psychoanalytic and a cultural study. New York: W.W. Norton.

Probyn E. 2005. Blush: faces of shame. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Ragland E. 1995. Essays on the pleasures of death: from Freud to Lacan. New York: Routledge.

Rogers J. 2017. Shame, pain and melancholia for the Australian constitution. In: Sheils B and Walsh J (eds). Narcissism, melancholia and the subject of community. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63829-4_7

Rothstein AM. 1994. Shame and the superego: clinical and theoretical considerations. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 49(1): 263-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00797308.1994.11823063

Sartre JP. 2003. Being and nothingness: an essay on phenomenological ontology. Transl HE Barnes. London: Routledge.

Sauvagnat F. 2018. Notes on the evolution of the relationship between guilt and shame in psychoanalysis and anthropology. Revista Latinoamericana De Psicopatologia Fundamental 21(4): 779-797. https://doi.org/10.1590/1415-4714.2018v21n4p779.6

Scheff TJ. 1998. Community conferences: shame and anger in therapeutic jurisprudence. Revista Juridica Universidad de Puerto Rico 67(1): 97-120.

Sontag S. 2003. Regarding the pain of others. New York: Picador. https://doi.org/10.3917/dio.201.0127

Tangney JP. 1994. The mixed legacy of the superego: adaptive and maladaptive aspects of shame and guilt. In: Masling JM and Bornstein RF (eds). Empirical perspectives on object relations theory. Washington: American Psychological Association.

Žižek S. 1994. Superego by default. Cardozo Law Review 16: 925-942.

Žižek S. 1996. The indivisible remainder. London: Verso.

Žižek S. 2005. Neighbours and other monsters: a plea for ethical violence. In: Taylor MC and Carlson TA (eds). The neighbour: three enquiries in political theology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 134-190.

Žižek S. 2006. How to read Lacan. London: Granta Books.

##submission.downloads##

Published

2021-07-05

Issue

Section

Articles