The environmental crisis. Who is responsible?
Keywords:
standard of living, simplistic lifestyle, quality of life, sustainable living, climate change, environmental crisis, sustainability, resource depletion, capitalism, overconsumption, adaptation, spiritualityAbstract
The environmental crisis is a substantiated reality, prompting discourse regarding potential solutions. This study undertakes an analysis of literature dating back to the mid-20th century. Technology is frequently cited as a major contributing factor. The fundamental cause however lies in the escalating human demand for opulent lifestyles. Industrial and commercial sectors are generally disinclined to curtail production due to the associated risks to profitability. Similarly, governments exhibit reluctance to promote policies advocating for degrowth or simpler modes of living, primarily out of concern for negative political repercussions. A viable solution requires a lifestyle change that emphasize well-being and sustainability over material accumulation. As substantive and enduring change is unlikely to emerge solely from technological innovation, economic theories, educational programmes or political reform, it necessitates a profound transformation in human values that may require a spiritual rather than a purely scientific approach.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Leon Hugo, Jean Hugo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Publishing rights: Author(s) may upload a second copy to institutional repositories. Disclaimer: Views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s). Publication thereof does not indicate that the Editorial Staff or the University of the Free State accept responsibility for its content.

