The environmental crisis. Who is responsible?

Authors

Keywords:

standard of living, simplistic lifestyle, quality of life, sustainable living, climate change, environmental crisis, sustainability, resource depletion, capitalism, overconsumption, adaptation, spirituality

Abstract

The environmental crisis is a substantiated reality, prompting discourse regarding potential solutions. This study undertakes an analysis of literature dating back to the mid-20th century. Technology is frequently cited as a major contributing factor. The fundamental cause however lies in the escalating human demand for opulent lifestyles. Industrial and commercial sectors are generally disinclined to curtail production due to the associated risks to profitability. Similarly, governments exhibit reluctance to promote policies advocating for degrowth or simpler modes of living, primarily out of concern for negative political repercussions. A viable solution requires a lifestyle change that emphasize well-being and sustainability over material accumulation. As substantive and enduring change is unlikely to emerge solely from technological innovation, economic theories, educational programmes or political reform, it necessitates a profound transformation in human values that may require a spiritual rather than a purely scientific approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-09

How to Cite

Hugo, L. and Hugo, J. (2025) “The environmental crisis. Who is responsible?”, Town and Regional Planning, 87, pp. 1–6. Available at: https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/trp/article/view/9466 (Accessed: 19 April 2026).

Issue

Section

Commentary

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.