Ecomodernism – defending a new humanist approach to nature

Authors

  • Patrick Giddy University of KwaZulu-Natal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38140/aa.v56i2.8973

Keywords:

Luc Ferry, ecomodernism, second humanism, Aristotelianism, human transcendance

Abstract

I defend here Luc Ferry’s new humanist approach to nature, ecomodernism, outlined in his Les Sept Ecologies (2021). Ferry’s notion of a “second humanism” takes into account oversights in the Enlightenment thinking, now seen as abstracted from the real life-world of persons, in particular, and arising out of changed conditions of marriage, that of “love-passion” as core value. I first outline Ferry’s account of the contemporary ecology landscape. Three anti-humanist approaches to nature are considered: the pre-modern supposition of intentionality in non-human living beings; deep ecology’s attribution of an equal functionality to humans and non-humans in the ecosystem; and evolutionary biology’s reductionist version of ethics. I then develop a positive account of the isomorphism of the intentionality of humans and all conscious living animals, through an Aristotelian account of sensation as a power of transcendence. The specific condition of human transcendence is reformulated by contemporary commentators through the notion of language, and again through the explanatory notion of self-enactment. This furnishes a foundation for the defence of the new humanist approach to nature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Collier J and Stingl M. 2012. Evolutionary moral realism. Biological Theory 7: 218- 226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-012-0067-x

Ferry L. 1995. The new ecological order. Translated by C Volk. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Ferry L. 2010. La révolution de l’amour. Pour une spiritualité laïque. Plon: Paris. Ferry L. 2021. Les sept ecologies. Pour une alternative au catastrophisme

antimoderne. Editions de l’Observatoire: Paris.

Giddy P. 2018. The human spirit and its appropriation: ethics, psyche and religious

symbology in the context of evolution. Religion and Theology 25: 88-110.

https://doi.org/10.1163/15743012-02501009

Horkheimer M and Adorno T. 1972 [1944]. Dialectic of enlightenment. Translated

by J Cumming. Allen Lane: London.

MacIntyre A. 2013. Dependent rational animals: why human beings need the

virtues. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

McCabe H. 2005. The good life. Continuum: London.

Radcliffe Richards J. 2000. Human nature after Darwin. Routledge: Abingdon. Ruse M. 1986. Taking Darwin seriously. A naturalistic approach to philosophy.

Oxford: Blackwell.

Shutte A. 1984. The spirituality of persons. South African Journal of Philosophy

(3): 54-8.

Stone C. 1972. Should trees have standing – toward legal rights for natural objects.

Southern California Law Review 45: 450-501.

Wittgenstein L. 1972. Philosophical investigations. Translated by GEM Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.

##submission.downloads##

Published

2024-12-28

How to Cite

Giddy, P. (2024). Ecomodernism – defending a new humanist approach to nature. Acta Academica: Critical Views on Society, Culture and Politics, 56(2), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.38140/aa.v56i2.8973