On the proletarian public sphere and its contemporaneity: crises, class and the media

Authors

  • Yiannis Mylonas National Research University Higher school of Economics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38140/aa.v55i2.7728

Keywords:

publicity, working-class experience, social change, politics, Green economic crisis, capitalist hegemony

Abstract

This article attempts a critical enquiry into contem­porary politics and culture as characterized by a prolonged capitalist crisis and its concomitant economic, social, political, and environmental dimensions. The article highlights the position of the working class today, and its critical potential for a politics of social change, and socialism. Class is understood in intersectional terms, taking into consideration the associations of ethnicity, race and gender in the formation of classed subjects in a globalized world. The experience of the lower classes in structural as well as political terms, is largely negated from publicity, or assimilated and distorted by the media and cultural industries. This has dire consequences for understanding the crisis, its causes, effects, and possible solutions, interpellating the working class and the poor to bourgeois norms and sensibilities. The negation of proletarian voices and the mediation of the proletarian experience by hegemonic bourgeois ideas is theoretically discussed, drawing on the proletarian public sphere notion, and also by looking at empirical contexts of media practices (notably the mainstream news coverage of the Greek/European economic crisis of the 2010’s, and the European “refugee crisis” from 2015 onwards). By not addressing the systemic foundations of crises (e.g., economic, humanitarian) in their complexity, the insecurities triggered by neoliberalism are articulated by liberal pundits and mainstream media through discourses blaming targeted groups (e.g., migrants and workers of the European periphery). Hence, the development of effective antagonistic politics, relies on the creation of both organizational forms and communication structures, to produce shared meanings and identities, as well as political goals and strategies; class perspectives are crucial to overcome the prolonged, current political impasse that capitalist society reproduces, and the possibility to overcome the crises that capitalism produces.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adorno T and Horkheimer M. 1989. The dialectic of the enlightenment. New York: Continuum.

Boukala S. 2019. European identity and the representation of Islam in the mainstream press. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.

Bruff I. 2014. The rise of authoritarian neoliberalism. Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society 26(1): 113-129.

Calhoun G. 1996. Introduction: Habermas and the public sphere. In: Calhoun G (ed). Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London: The MIT Press.

Cymbrowsky B. 2017. The proletarian public space and its transformation: the case of socialist and post-socialist cities. Sociologica 2: 1-27.

Dardot P and Laval C. 2014. The new way of the world: on the neoliberal society. London: Verso.

Dardot P and Laval C. 2019. Never-ending nightmare: the neoliberal assault on democracy. London: Verso.

Davidson N and Saull R. 2017. Neoliberalism and the far-right: a contradictory embrace. Critical Sociology 43(4-5): 707–724.

Dean J. 2012. The communist horizon. London: Verso.

Dean J. 2016. Crowds and party. London: Verso.

Dean J. 2019. Comrade: an essay on political belonging. London: Verso.

Eriksson G. 2015. Ridicule as a strategy for the recontextualization of the working class. Critical Discourse Studies 12(1): 20-38.

Fekete L. 2018. Migrants, borders and the criminalisation of solidarity in the EU. Race and Class 59(4): 65-83.

Gallas A. 2016. The Thatcherite offensive: A neo-Poulantzasian analysis. Leiden: Brill.

Garnham N. 2000. Emancipation, the media, and modernity: arguments about the media and social theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Giddens A. 1991. Modernity and self identity: self and society in the late modern age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Gilbert J and Williams A. 2022. Hegemony now. London: Verso.

Habermas J. 1997 [1961]. The structural transformation of the public sphere. Athens: Nisos.

Hansen M. 2016 [1991]. Foreword. In: Kluge A and Negt O (eds). Public sphere and experience: analysis of the bourgeois and proletarian public sphere. London: Verso.

Harkins S and Lugo-Ocando J. 2018. Poor news: media discourses of poverty in times of austerity. London, New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Harvey D. 2014. Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jacobsson D. 2018. Business elite competition or a common concern? Journalism Studies 19(1): 105-125.

Kluge A and Negt O. 2016 [1972]. Public sphere and experience: analysis of the bourgeois and proletarian public sphere. London: Verso.

Koselleck R. 2006. Crisis. The Journal of History of Ideas 67(2).

Knödler-Bunte E, Lennox S and Lennox F. 1975. The proletarian public sphere and political organization: an analysis of Oskar Negt and Alexander Kluge's The public sphere and experience. New German Critique. Winter 1975(4): 51-75.

Kostopoulos C and Mylonas Y. 2022. Framing migration in the Greek press: an analysis of the ‘Evros events’ in left, liberal, and far-right newspapers. Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221134

Koutouza D. 2019. Surplus citizens: struggle and nationalism in the Greek crisis. London: Pluto.

Laclau E and Mouffe C. 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.

Langston R. 2020. Dark matter, a guide to Alexander Kluge and Oskar Negt. London: Verso.

McManus M. 2020. The rise of post-modern conservatism: neoliberalism, post-modern culture, and reactionary politics. Cham: Palgrave McMillan.

Malm A. 2018. The progress of this storm. London: Verso.

Malm A. 2020. Corona, climate, chronic emergency: war communism in the twenty-first century. London: Verso.

Mondon A and Winter A. 2020. Reactionary democracy: how racism and the populist far right became mainstream. London: Verso.

Mylonas Y. 2019. The “Greek crisis” in Europe: race, class, and politics. Leiden: Brill.

Mylonas Y. 2020. Crisis, authoritarian neoliberalism, and the return of “new democracy” to power in Greece. Stasis 10(2): 181-208.

Poell T, Nieborg D and Duffy BE. 2022. Platforms and cultural production. Cambridge: Polity.

Robin C. 2017. The reactionary mind: conservatism from Edmund Burke to Donald Trump. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Roos J. 2019. Why not default? The political economy of sovereign debt. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Sajjad T. 2018. What’s in a name? ‘Refugees’, ‘migrants’ and the politics of labelling. Race and Class 60(2): 40-62.

Sandhu A. 2007. The counter-public sphere. In: Intellectuals and the people. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Souvlis G and Lalakis D. 2020. Organic crisis and counter-hegemonic responses in the interwar era and the era of memoranda in Greece. In: Rayner J, Falls S, Souvlis G and Nelms TC (eds). Back to the ’30s? Recurring crises of capitalism, liberalism, and democracy. Cham: Springer.

Skeggs B. 1997. Formations of Class and Gender: becoming respectable. London: Sage.

Skeggs B. 2003. Class, self, culture. London: Routledge.

Stolze T. 2000. A displaced transition: Habermas on the public sphere. In: Hill M and Montag W (eds). Masses, classes and the public sphere. London: Verso.

Sobieraj K. 2022. The Euro crisis in the press: political debate in Germany, Poland, and the United Kingdom. Cham: Springer.

Streeck W. 2016. How will capitalism end? London: Verso.

Traverso E. 2021. Revolution, an intellectual history. London: Verso.

Webber F. 2017. Europe’s unknown war. Race and Class 59(1): 36-53.

Webber F. 2018. Refusing refugee. Race and Class 59(3): 98-105.

Wodak R. 2015. The politics of fear. London: Sage.

Wright EO. 2015. Understanding class. London: Verso.

Published

2023-12-06