In medias res: the diminishing of historical continuity in modern thought

Authors

  • Kara Te Water University of the Free State

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38140/aa.v55i2.7726

Keywords:

digital media, manipulation, modernity, rationality, contemplation, action

Abstract

Innovation and future predictions are discussed as the main goals of modern technology. Living in this empirical, modern world set on the future has the possibility of diminishing the value of historical continuity as observation and outcome-based theory take precedence over contemplation and tradition. It is proposed that the forgetfulness of modernity creates a stilted perception of time and thought which results in a dissonance between the perceiving subject and their surroundings. This is exacerbated by digital media as it mostly frames information as an attractive or trending source of amusement rather than as a possibility for edification. The result of this dissonance between the subject and their surroundings and the influence of digital media can be seen in the thoughtless or repetitive action and the abdication of action altogether in favour of escape from reality. This is problematised in as far constructive action for the well-being of the individual cannot be sustained in terms of the current engagement with digital technology.

 

Drawing on thinkers such as Connerton (1989, 2009), Davidson (2004), Habermas (1987, 1989), a discussion follows regarding how the diminishing historical continuity in thought can lead to the manipulation and a lack of rationality discussed in Horkheimer’s and Adorno’s culture industry thesis. To adopt the approach of continuity as embodied in the phrase in medias res(in the midst of things) in interpretation, rather than an observation assuming novel activity, may bring an alternative consideration for how modern technology (specifically the digital) can be used to assist the individual in taking contextual action rather than trying to escape action altogether while reframing the potential of digital technology towards a constructive, achievable standing rather than resigning it to a problematic system of distraction and degradation of thought.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benjamin W. 2003. The work of art in the age of its technological reproductibility. In: Jennings MW and Eiland H (eds). Walter Benjamin: selected writings volume 4, 1938-1940. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Connerton P. 1989. How societies remember: themes in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Connerton P. 2009. How modernity forgets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Davidson D. 2004. Problems of rationaliy. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Frankl VE and Batthyány A. 2010. The feeling of meaninglessness: a challenge to psycotherapy and philosophy. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.

Gadamer H-G. 2004. Truth and method. London, New York: Continuum Books.

Habermas J. 1987. The theory of communicative action, volume 2: lifeworld and system: a critique of functionalist reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

Habermas J. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: The Mit Press.

Hegel G. 1977. The phenemenology of spirit. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Horkheimer M and Adorno TW. 2002. The culture industry: enlightenment as mass deception. In: Noerr GS (ed). Dialectic of enlightenment: philosophical fragments. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Husserl E. 1970. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: an introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Kant I. [1781] 1881. Critique of pure reason. London: Macmillan and Co.

Kant I. 2002. What is enlightenment? Konigsberg: Blackmask Online.

Langer SK. 1948. Philosophy in a new key: a study in the symbolism of reason, rite, and art. New York: The New American Library.

Levy P. 1998. Becoming virtual: reality in the digital age. London: Plenum Trade.

Marcuse H. 1991. One-dimensional man: studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society (2nd ed). New York: Routledge.

Mumford L. 1934. Technics and civilization (1st ed). London: Routledge.

Pariser E. 2011. The filter bubble: what the internet is hiding from you. (1 st ed). New York: The Penguin Press.

Turkle S. 2011. Alone, together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.

Published

2023-12-06