No voice for the Global South – analysing the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association (ISA)
Keywords:epistemic inequality, knowledge production, postcolonial and decolonial studies, International Relations, North-South divide
The article contributes to the postcolonial and decolonial debate on epistemic inequality in International Relations (IR) research by analysing the global representation of universities at the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association in Toronto in 2019. The results are fourfold. First, the overwhelmingly represented Western countries are mostly located at universities in North America and Europe. Second, universities located in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) are largely underrepresented compared to their population size and number of universities. Third, even in so- called Global South panels, the representation of scholars from the Global North is much higher than that of academics from the Global South. Fourth, the representation gap also holds true when analysing researcher mobility and individual publication records. The implications of the case study results shed light on the difficulties of analysing epistemic violence without contributing oneself to the prevalent asymmetries.
Acharya A. 2016. Advancing global IR: challenges, contentions, and contributions. International Studies Review 18(1): 4-15.
Agnew J. 2007. Know-where: geographies of knowledge of world politics. International Political Sociology 1(2): 138-148.
Andrews N. 2020. International Relations (IR) pedagogy, dialogue and diversity: taking the IR course syllabus seriously. All Azimuth 9(2): 267-281.
Bacon F. 1620. Novum Organum. New York: P. F. Collier.
Blaney DL and Tickner AB. 2017. Worlding, ontological politics and the possibility of a decolonial IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 45(3): 293-311.
Blumenberg H. 1966. Der Prozeß der theoretischen Neugierde. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Breuning M and Lu K. 2010. Participation by women in ISA annual meetings, 2005–2009. International Studies Perspectives 11(3): 242-254.
Briggs RC and Weathers S. 2016. Gender and location in African politics scholarship: the other white man's burden? African Affairs 115(460): 466-489.
Brunner C. 2013. Situiert und seinsverbunden in der Geopolitik des Wissens. Zeitschrift für Diskursforschung 1(3): 226-245.
Brunner C. 2021. Conceptualizing epistemic violence: an interdisciplinary assemblage for IR. International Politics Review 9:193-212.
Canaparo C. 2009. Geo-Epistemology. Latin America and the location of knowledge. Bern: Peter Lang.
Castro-Gomez S and Martin DA. 2002. The Social Sciences, epistemic violence, and the problem of the ‘invention of the Other’. Nepantla: Views from South 3(2): 269-285.
Chadha Behera N. 2021. Globalization, deglobalization and knowledge production. International Affairs 97(5):1579-1597.
Chandra U. 2013. The case for a postcolonial approach to the study of politics. New Political Science 35(3): 479-491.
Chimakonam J. 2017. African philosophy and global epistemic injustice. Journal of Global Ethics 13(2):120-137.
Colgan JD. 2019. American perspectives and blind spots on world politics. Journal of Global Security Studies 4(3): 300-309.
Collyer F. 2018. Global patterns in the publishing of academic knowledge: global North, global South. Current Sociology 66(1): 56-73.
Crawford G, Mai-Bornu Z and Landström K. 2021. Decolonising knowledge production on Africa: why it’s still necessary and what can be done. Journal of the British Academy 9(1): 21-46.
Demeter M. 2020. Academic knowledge production and the global South: questioning inequality and under-representation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
De Sousa Santos B and Meneses MP. 2020. Knowledges born in the struggle. Constructing the epistemologies of the Global South. New York: Routledge.
Economou F, Hassapis C, Philippas N and Tsionas M. 2017. Foreign direct investment determinants in OECD and developing countries. Review of Development Economics 21(3): 527-542.
Falk MT and Hagsten E. 2022. Gender diversity of keynote speakers at virtual academic conferences. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, online first.
Faraldo-Cabana P. 2018. Research excellence and anglophone dominance: the case of law, criminology and social science. In: Carrington K, Hogg R, Scott J and Sozzo M (eds). The Palgrave handbook of criminology and the Global South. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fricker M. 2007. Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Global South Caucus (GSCIS). 2020. Global South Caucus (GSCIS) 2020 annual report. International Studies Association. Available at: https://www.isanet.org/Portals/0/Documents/GSCIS/GSCIS%20Annual%20Report%202020.pdf?ver=2021-03-18-135819-723. [Accessed 11 July 2022].
Grosfoguel R. 2007. The epistemic decolonial turn: beyond Political-Economy paradigms. Cultural Studies 21(2-3): 211-223.
Grovogui SN. 2006. Beyond eurocentrism and anarchy. Memories of international order and institutions. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hamati-Ataya I. 2018. The sociology of knowledge as postphilosophical epistemology: out of IR’s ‘socially constructed’ idealism. International Studies Review 20(1): 3-29.
Hendrix CS and Vreede J. 2019. US dominance in International Relations and security scholarship in leading journals. Journal of Global Security Studies 4(3): 310-320.
Hobson JM and Sajed A. 2017. Navigating beyond the eurofetishist frontier of critical IR theory: exploring the complex landscapes of non-Western agency. International Studies Review 19(4): 547-572.
Hoffmann S. 1977. An American social science: International Relations. Daedalus 106(3): 41-60.
International Studies Association. 2022. Who we are. International Studies Association. Available at: https://www.isanet.org/ [Accessed 12 July 2022].
Khoo SM, Mucha W, Pesch C and Wielenga C. 2020. Epistemic (in)justice and decolonisation in higher education: experiences of a cross-site teaching project. Acta Academica 52(1): 54-75.
Kristensen P. 2015. Revisiting the ‘American Social Science’ – mapping the geography of International Relations. International Studies Perspectives 16(3): 246-269.
Laffey M and Nadarajah S. 2016. Postcolonialism. In: Alan Collins (ed). Contemporary security studies. 122-138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lake D. 2016. White man’s IR: an intellectual confession. Perspective on Politics 14(4):1112-1122.
Lohaus M and Wemheuer-Vogelaar W. 2021. Who publishes where? Exploring the geographic diversity of global IR journals. International Studies Review 23(3): 645-669.
Luhmann N. 2002. Das Erziehungssystem der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Maliniak D, Peterson S, Powers R and Tierney MJ. 2018. Is International Relations a global discipline? Hegemony, insularity, and diversity in the field. Security Studies 27(3): 448-484.
Mantz F. 2019. Decolonizing the IPE syllabus: eurocentrism and the coloniality of knowledge in International Political Economy. Review of International Political Economy 26(6):1361-1378.
Medina J. 2013. The epistemology of resistance. Gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and resistant imaginations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mignolo WD. 2002. The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference. The South Atlantic Quarterly 101(1): 57-96.
Mignolo WD. 2009. Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and de-colonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society 26(7-8):1-23.
Mitova V. 2020. Decolonising knowledge here and now. Philosophical Papers 49(2):191-212.
Morley L. 2016. Troubling intra-actions: gender, neo-liberalism and research in the global academy. Journal of Education Policy 31(1): 28-45.
Moyo L. 2020. The decolonial turn in Media Studies in Africa and the Global South. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mucha W and Pesch C. 2019. Welches Wissen schaffen wir? ZIB Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 26(2): 34-66.
Murray C. 2020. Imperial dialectics and epistemic mapping: from decolonisation to anti-eurocentric IR. European Journal of International Relations 26(2): 419-442.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni SJ. 2018. Epistemic freedom in Africa: deprovincialization and decolonisation. Abingdon: Routledge.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni SJ. 2021. The primacy of knowledge in the making of shifting modern global imaginaries. International Politics Reviews 9:110-15.
Nyúl B, Lantos N, Reicher S and Kende A. 2021. The limits of gender and regional diversity in the European Association of Social Psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology 51(4-5): 800-819.
OECD. 2020. Who we are. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/about/. [Accessed 10 December 2021].
Patel K. 2020. Race and a decolonial turn in Development Studies. Third World Quarterly 41(9):1463-1475.
Pereira MDM. 2017. Power, knowledge and feminist scholarship. An ethnography of academia. New York: Routledge.
Peters I and Wemheuer-Vogelaar W. 2016. Globalizing International Relations. Scholarship amidst divides and diversity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Phull K, Ciflikli G and Meibauer G. 2019. Gender and bias in the International Relations curriculum: insights from reading lists. European Journal of International Relations 25(2): 383-407.
Quijano A. 2000. Coloniality of power and eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology 15(2): 215-232.
Reynolds JM. 2020. ‘What if there's something wrong with her?’ – How Biomedical technologies contribute to epistemic injustice in healthcare. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 58(1):161-185.
Sabaratnam M. 2020. Is IR theory white? Racialised subject-positioning in three canonical texts. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 49(1): 3-31.
Saideman S. 2018. The apparent decline of the IR paradigms: examining patterns of publications, perceptions, and citations. International Studies Review 20(4): 685-703.
Scully J. 2018. From ‘she would say that, wouldn’t she?’ to ‘does she take sugar?’ Epistemic injustice and disability. IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 11(1):106-124.
Seabrooke L and Young K. 2017. The networks and niches of international political economy. Review of International Political Economy 24(2): 288-331.
Sharma A. 2021. Decolonizing International Relations: confronting erasures through indigenous knowledge systems. International Studies 58(1): 25-40.
Sharman J and Weaver C. 2013. RIPE, the American School and diversity in global IPE. Review of International Political Economy 20(5):1082-1100.
Smith K and Tickner AB. 2020. International Relations for the Global South. London: Routledge.
Spivak GC. 1988. Can the subaltern speak?. In: Nelson C and Grossberg L (eds). Marxism and the interpretation of culture, 66-111. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Thapar-Björkert S and Farahani F. 2019. Epistemic modalities of racialised knowledge production in the Swedish academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies 42(16): 214-232.
Tickner AB. 2013. Core, periphery and (neo)Imperialist International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 19(3): 627-646.
Tickner AB and Blaney D. 2012. Thinking the International differently. Abingdon: Routledge.
Tickner AB and Wæver O. 2009. International Relations scholarship around the world. Abingdon: Routledge.
Tripathi S. 2021. International Relations and the ‘Global South’: from epistemic hierarchies to dialogic encounters. Third World Quarterly 42(9): 2039-2054.
Tucker K. 2018. Unraveling coloniality in International Relations: knowledge, relationality, and strategies for engagement. International Political Sociology 12(3): 215-232.
Tuastad D. 2003. Neo-Orientalism and the new barbarism thesis: aspects of symbolic violence in the Middle East conflict(s). Third World Quarterly 24(4): 591-599.
Turton H. 2016. International Relations and American dominance: a diverse discipline. London: Routledge.
Vázquez R. 2011. Translation as erasure: thoughts on modernity’s epistemic violence. Journal of Historical Sociology 24(1): 27-44.
Wæver O. 1998. The sociology of a not so international discipline: American and European developments in International Relations. International Organization 52(4): 687-727.
Wæver O and Tickner AB. 2009. Introduction: geocultural epistemologies. In: Tickner AB and Wæver O (eds). International Relations Scholarship around the World. Abingdon: Routledge.
Wemheuer-Vogelaar W and Peters I. 2016. Introduction: global(izing) International Relations: studying geo-epistemological divides and diversity. In: Peters I and Wemheuer-Vogelaar W (eds). Globalizing International Relations: scholarship amidst divides and diversity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Young J, Lind C, Orange JB and Savundranayagam M. 2019. Expanding current understandings of epistemic injustice and dementia: learning from stigma theory. Journal of Aging Studies 48: 76-84.
Copyright (c) 2023 Witold Mucha, Maximilian Wegener
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.