Populism, courts and institucionalidad: a view from Latin America
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18820/24150479/aa54i3/2Keywords:
democracy, populism, institutions, constitutional courtsAbstract
This paper addresses the relationship between populism and constitutional courts, with reference to the Latin American context. By means of a genealogical reconstruction of the ideas of populism and institucionalidad, we study how the debate on judicial activism has been taken up by populist politics. We introduce a theoretical model that sees in contemporary forms of populism a strategy to reparadoxify the legal system, denying courts the ability to protect the organisational autonomy of the judiciary. This is of interest because, in the last 30 years, the courts have represented a new field for the creation of democratic legitimacy, allowing minority groups to defend their political agendas through fundamental rights litigation.
Downloads
References
Acemoglu D and Robinson JA. 2000. Why did the west extend the franchise? Democracy, inequality, and growth in historical perspective. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(4): 1167-1199.
Arato A. 2019. Populism, constitutional courts, and civil society. In: Landfried C (ed). Judicial power: how constitutional courts affect political transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bahia A and Iotti P. 2013. ADI N. 4.277 - Constitucionalidade e relevância da decisão sobre união homoafetiva: o STF como instituição contramajoritária no reconhecimento de uma concepção plural de família. Revista Direito GV 9(1): 65-92.
Benedetti MÁ and Sáenz MJ. 2019. Las audiencias públicas de la Corte Suprema: Apertura y límites de la participación ciudadana en la justicia. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.
Benvindo JZ. 2010. On the limits of constitutional adjudication: deconstructing balancing and judicial activism. Heidelberg: Springer.
Bettermann KA. 1988. Staatsrecht, Verfahrensrecht, Zivilrecht: Schriften aus vier Jahrzehnten. Berlin: Heymann.
Von Bogdandy A et al. 2013. Ius constitutionale commune en derechos humanos en América Latina. Mexico City: Editorial Porrúa.
Von Bogdandy A. 2017. Ius Constitutionale Commune en América Latina: observations on transformative constitutionalism. In: Von Bogdandy A, Mac-Gregor EF, Morales Antoniazzi M, Piovesan F and Ximena Soley X. (eds). Transformative constitutionalism in Latin America: the emergence of a new Ius Commune. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Von Bogdandy A et al. 2017. Introduction. In: Von Bogdandy A, Mac-Gregor EF, Morales Antoniazzi M, Piovesan F and Ximena Soley X. (eds). Transformative constitutionalism in Latin America: the emergence of a new Ius Commune. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brinks DM. 2019. Access to what? Legal agency and access to justice for indigenous peoples in Latin America. The Journal of Development Studies 55(3): 348-365.
Caballero MA. 2011. Social movements and the Constitutional Court: legal recognition of the rights of same-sex couples in Colombia. Sur - International Journal on Human Rights 14: 7-32.
Canovan M. 1999. Trust the People! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies 47(1): 2-16.
Cardoso, F Henrique and Faletto E. 1979. Dependency and development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Derrida J. 1992. Force of law: the metaphysical foundation of authority. In: Cornell D, Rosenfeld M and Carlson D (eds). Deconstruction and the possibility of justice. New York: Routledge.
Dos Santos T. 2020. Socialismo ou fascismo: O novo caráter da dependência e o dilema latino-americano. Florianópolis: Insular Livros.
Dworkin R. 1986. Law’s empire. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Elias MLGGR. 2021. The Issue of abortion in contemporary Brazil: an analysis of feminist litigation in the Supreme Court. Feminist Legal Studies, 29(2): 159-179.
Freelon K. 2022. Bolsonaro makes new threat to the judiciary about elections and says good will win: President’s official trip to Rio Grande do Norte has ‘rally’, prayer, motorcycle and horseback riding. Folha de São Paulo (São Paulo). 31 March 2022. Available at: https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/internacional/en/brazil/2022/03/bolsonaro-makes-new-threat-to-the-judiciary-about-elections-and-says-good-will-win.shtml [accesssed on 2 November 2022].
Fromont M. 1975. Les droits fondamentaux dans l’ordre juridique de la RFA. In: Mélanges Eisenmann. Paris: Cujas.
Fuenzalida S. 2015. Desarrollo de la jurisprudencia en Chile sobre la consulta indígena: los casos del Tribunal Constitucional y la Corte Suprema. Revue québécoise de droit international. Special issue: 149-177.
Furtado C and Girvan C. 1973. The Brazilian model. Social and Economic Studies 22(1): 122-131.
Gargarella R. 2013. Latin American constitutionalism, 1810-2010: The engine room of the Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gerchunoff P and Bértola Leds. 2011. Institucionalidad y desarrollo económico en América Latina. Santiago: CEPAL.
Gerhardt MJ. 2002. The rhetoric of judicial critique: from judicial restraint to the virtual Bill of Rights. William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 10(3): 585-645.
Grimm D. 2021. Neue Radikalkritik an der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit. Der Staat 59: 321-353.
Gusy Christoph. 1982. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht als politischer Faktor. Europäische Grundrechte- Zeitschrift 9(5): 93-101.
Hawkins K and Ruth S. 2015. The impact of populism on liberal democracy. In: 8o Congreso de La Asociación Latinoamericana de Ciencia Política. Lima: NI.
Hirschl R. 2009. Towards juristocracy: the origins and consequences of the new constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hogg PW. 1997. The Charter Dialogue between courts and legislatures (Or perhaps the Charter of Rights isn’t such a bad thing after all). Osgoode Hall Law Journal 35(1): 75-124.
Huneeus A. 2015. Reforming the state from afar: structural reform litigation at the human rights courts. The Yale Journal of International Law 40(1): 1-40.
Kaltwasser CR and Hawkins KA. 2018. Introduction. In: Hawkins KA, Carlin RE, Littvay L and Kaltwasser (eds). The ideational approach to populism: concept, theory, and analysis. New York: Taylor and Francis.
Kmiec KD. 2004. The origin and current meanings of ‘judicial activism’. California Law Review 92(5): 1441-1477.
Laclau E. 2005. On populist reason. London: Verso Books.
Limbach J. 2000. The role of the Federal Constitutional Court. SMU Law Review 53(2): 429-442.
Luhmann, N. 2004. Law as a social system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maus I. 1989. Justiz als gesellschaftliche Über-Ich – Zur Funtion von Rechtsprechung in der “vaterlosen” Gesellschaft. In: Sturz der Götter? Vaterbilder in Literatur, Medien und Kultur des 20 Jahrhunderts. Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp.
Möller K. 2019. Populismus und Verfassung. Der autoritäre Populismus als Herausforderung für die liberale Demokratie. Zeitschrift für Politik 66: 430-444.
Möller K. 2021. Populism and the political system: a critical systems theory approach to the study of populism. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354238402_Populism_and_the_Political_System_A_Critical_Systems_Theory_Approach_to_the_Study_of_Populism [accessed on 3 November 2022].
Mudde C and Kaltwasser RC. 2012. Populism in Europe and the Americas: threat or corrective to democracy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neves M. 1994. A constitucionalização simbólica. São Paulo: Acadêmica.
North DC. 1991. Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(1): 97-112.
Peria M and Bailey SR. 2014. Remaking racial inclusion: combining race and class in Brazil’s new affirmative action. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies 9(2): 156-176.
Posner EA and Vermeule A. 2011. The executive unbound: after the Madisonian republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prebisch R. 1949. El desarrollo económico de la América Latina y algunos de sus principales problemas. In: Gurrieri A. La obra de Prebisch en la Cepal. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Radomysler C. 2013. STF: um espaço de luta do movimento negro / The Brazilian Supreme Court (STF): battleground for the black movement. Revista Direito e Praxis 4(1): 31-51.
Riker WH. 1988. Liberalism against populism: a confrontation between the theory of democracy and the theory of social choice. Long Grove: Waveland Press.
Rivas Leone JA. 2000. Repensar la democracia: Una lectura de Norbert Lechner. Nueva Sociedad 170: 6-12.
Rodríguez-Garavito CA and Arenas LC. 2005. Indigenous rights, transnational activism, and legal mobilization: the struggle of the U’wa people in Colombia. In: de S Santos B and Rodríguez-Garavito CA (eds). Law and globalization from below: towards a cosmopolitan legality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosanvallon P. 2020. Le Siècle du populisme. Histoire, théorie, critique. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
Ruibal A. 2015. Social movements and constitutional politics in Latin America: reconfiguring alliances, framings and legal opportunities in the judicialisation of abortion rights in Brazil. Contemporary Social Science 10(4): 375-385.
Ruibal A. 2021. Using constitutional courts to advance abortion rights in Latin America. International Feminist Journal of Politics 23(4): 579-599.
Shirley MM. 2008. Institutions and development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Stoessel S et al. 2020. Hacia una nueva lógica del populismo: De la ruptura de las instituciones a la institucionalidad populista. Recerca: Revista de pensament i anàlisi 25(1): 25-46.
Thayer ER. 1891. Judicial legislation: its legitimate function in the development of the common law. Harvard Law Review 5(4): 172-201.
Thornhill C. 2018. The sociology of law and the global transformation of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Global Law Series).
Thornhill C and de Araújo Calabria CR. 2020. Global constitutionalism and democracy: the case of Colombia. Jus Cogens, 2(2): 155-183.
Tushnet M. 2000. Taking the constitution away from the courts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Valdés ED. 2003. El pensamiento latinoamericano en el siglo XX. Tomo II: Desde la CEPAL al neoliberalismo (1950-1990). Buenos Aires: Biblos.
Valdívia GG and Tapia Jeds. 1979. Evolución de la Organización Político-Constitucional en América Latina. 1950-1975). Vol II: Sudamérica y España. Mexico City: Universidade Autonoma de México.
Waldron J. 2006. The core of the case against judicial review. The Yale Law Journal 115: 1346-1406.
Wallerstein I. 1974. Dependence in an interdependent world: the limited possibilities of transformation within the capitalist world economy. African Studies Review 17(1): 1-26.
##submission.downloads##
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Gabriel Rezende
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
