Algopopulism and recursive conduct: grappling with fascism and the new populisms vis-à-vis Arendt, Deleuze and Guattari, and Stiegler

Authors

  • Chantelle Gray North-West University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18820/24150479/aa54i3/8

Keywords:

fascism, algopopulism, micropolitics, recursive conduct, algorithmic governmentality

Abstract

The continuing rise of right-wing populisms and fascism across the globe, mobilised by various factors such as the use of social technologies and the weaponisation of nationalism, xenophobia, sexism and racism – to name a few – provokes important questions in terms of resistance. Moreover, given that the lines between the new populisms and fascism are becoming increasingly nebulous, it is imperative that we at least attempt to better understand the conditions – including the more hauntological, which is to say historically and structurally invisibilised – from which algorithmic governmentality and its corollary, recursive conduct, are born. On that account, I unpack two understandings of fascism, first tracing it macropolitically through the work of Hannah Arendt and, thereafter, looking at its more micropolitical and libidinal aspects vis-à-vis the work of Deleuze and Guattari. I do so because it is my contention that there is a historical correlation between Arendt’s theorisation of a generalised espionage and our contemporary surveillance systems, as well as between Deleuze and Guattari’s theorisation of desire and the harnessing of affect through machine learning methods and their deployment via social media platforms, all of which aid the propagation of certain forms of populism – and even fascism. This is what I call algopopulism: algorithmically aided politics that transforms the ‘we’ into the ‘they’ through what can be thought of as recursive conduct or the digital exercise of power and its structuring of the field of possible action and thought. In turn, I link this to Stiegler’s understanding of negative sublimation, a paralysis of the human spirit which occurs due to, among other things, the generalised proletarianisation of knowledge, ultimately provoking the short-circuiting of processes of transindividuation. Finally, I offer some notes on resistance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agamben G. 2020. The invention of an epidemic (column entry). Quodlibet. 26 February. Available at: https://www.quodlibet.it/giorgio-agamben-l-invenzione-di-un-epidemia [accessed on 23 November 2022].

Agamben G. 2021. Second-class citizens (column entry). Quodlibet, 16 July. Available at: https://www.quodlibet.it/giorgio-agamben-cittadini-di-seconda-classe [accessed on 23 November 2022].

Ahmed S. 2019. The messy truth about social credit. Logic. 1 May. Available at: https://logicmag.io/china/the-messy-truth-about-social-credit/ [accessed on 23 November 2022].

Amoore L and Piotukh V. 2016. Algorithmic life: calculative devices in the age of big data. London, New York: Routledge.

Arendt H. 1962. The origins of totalitarianism. Cleveland, New York: The World Publishing Company.

Argentino M-A. 2021. QAnon and the storm of the U.S. Capitol: the offline effect of online conspiracy theories. The Conversation. 7 January. Available at: https://theconversation.com/qanon-and-the-storm-of-the-u-s-capitol-the-offline-effect-of-online-conspiracy-theories-152815 [accessed on 23 November 2022].

Blackman L. 2019. Haunted data affect, transmedia, weird science. London, New York: Bloomsbury.

Bratton B. 2015. Outlining artificial intelligence: reckoning with turing tests. In: Pasquinelli M (ed). Alleys of your mind: augmented intelligence and its traumas. Lüneberg: Meson Press.

Bratton B. 2021. Agamben WTF, or how philosophy failed the pandemic (blog). Verso. 28 July. Available at: https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/5125-agamben-wtf-or-how-philosophy-failed-the-pandemic [accessed on 23 November 2022].

Davis C. 2005. État présent: hauntology, spectres, and phantoms. French Studies LIX(3): 373-379.

Deleuze G. 1988. Foucault. Transl S Hand. London: Athlone Press.

Deleuze G. 1992. Postscript on the societies of control. October 59: 3-7.

Deleuze G. 2004a. Intellectuals and power. In: Lapoujade D (ed). Desert islands and other texts 1953-1974. Transl M Taormina. London, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Deleuze G. 2004b. On capitalism and desire. In: Lapoujade D (ed). Desert islands and other texts 1953-1974. Transl M Taormina. London, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Deleuze G. 2007. The brain is the screen. In: Lapoujade D (ed). Two regimes of madness: texts and interviews 1975-1995. Transl A Hodges and M Taormina. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).

Deleuze G and Guattari F. 1983. Anti-Oedipus: capitalism and schizophrenia Vol. 1. Transl R Hurley, M Seem and HR Lane. London, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Deleuze G and Guattari F. 1987. A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia Vol. 2. Transl B Massumi. London, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

d’Entrèves MP. 1993. The political philosophy of Hannah Arendt. London, New York: Routledge.

Derrida J. 2002. Spectrographies. In: Derrida J and Stiegler B (eds). Echographies of television: filmed interviews. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Dillet B. 2017. Proletarianization, deproletarianization, and the rise of the amateur. Boundary 2 44(1): 79-105.

Evans B and Reid J. 2013. Introduction: fascism in all its forms. In: Evans B and Reid J (eds). Deleuze and fascism. security: war: aesthetics. London, New York: Routledge.

Foucault M. 1982. The subject and power. Critical Inquiry 8(4): 777-795.

Foucault M. 2008. The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-79. Transl G Burchell. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Frankish K and Ramsey WM. 2014. Introduction. In: Frankish K and Ramsey WM (eds). The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Freccero C. 2013. Queer spectrality: haunting the past. In: Pilar Blanco M (del) and Peeren E (eds). The spectralities reader: ghosts and haunting in contemporary cultural theory. London, New York: Bloomsbury Press.

Genosko G. 2017. Black holes of politics: resonances of microfascism. La Deleuziana 5: 59-67.

Gray C. 2022. Anarchism after Deleuze and Guattari: fabulating futures. London, New York: Bloomsbury.

Gray C and Eloff A. 2022. Fabulation in a time of algorithmic ecology: making the future possible again. In: Das S and Pratihar AR (eds). Technology, urban space and the networked community. London: Springer Nature.

Horkheimer M and Adorno TW. 1989. Dialectic of enlightenment. Transl J Cumming. New York: Continuum.

Hui Y. 2018. Archives of the future: remarks on the concept of tertiary protention. In: Inscription. Göteborg: Landsarkivet i Göteborg, 129-151.

Kalpokas I. 2019. Algorithmic governance: politics and law in the post-human era. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

Loucaides D. 2019. What happens when techno-utopians actually run a country. Wired. 14 February. Available at: https://www.wired.com/story/italy-five-star-movement-techno-utopians/ [accessed on 23 November 2022].

Longley R. 2021. Totalitarianism, authoritarianism, and fascism. ThoughtCo. 6 December. Available at: https://www.thoughtco.com/totalitarianism-authoritarianism-fascism-4147699 [accessed on 23 November 2022].

Marx K. 1976. Capital Volume 1. Transl B Fowkes. London: Penguin Books.

McQuillan D. 2022. Resisting AI: an anti-fascist approach to artificial intelligence. Bristol: Bristol University Press.

Parisi L. 2015. Instrumental reason, algorithmic capitalism, and the incomputable. In: Pasquinelli M (ed). Alleys of your mind: augmented intelligence and its traumas. Lüneberg: Meson Press.

Pilar Blanco M (del) and Peeren E. 2013. Haunted historiographies/introduction. In: Pilar Blanco M (del) and Peeren E (eds). The spectralities reader: ghosts and haunting in contemporary cultural theory. London, New York: Bloomsbury Press.

Revelli M. 2017. The new populism: democracy stares into the abyss. Transl D Broder. London, New York: Verso.

Rouvroy A. 2011. Algorithmic governmentality and the death of politics. Green European Journal. 27 March. Available at: https://www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/algorithmic-governmentality-and-the-death-of-politics/. [accessed on 23 November 2022].

Rouvroy A and Stiegler B. 2016. The digital regime of truth: from the algorithmic governmentality to a new rule of law. Transl A Nony and B Dillet. La Deleuziana 3: 6-29.

Rouvroy A. 2020. Algorithmic governmentality and the death of politics. Green European Journal, 27 March. Available at: https://www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/algorithmic-governmentality-and-the-death-of-politics/ [accessed on 23 November 2022].

Stiegler B. 2006. Anamnesis and hypomnesis: the memories of desire. Ars Industrialis. 8 April. Available at: https://arsindustrialis.org/ anamnesis-and-hypomnesis [accessed on 23 November 2022].

Stiegler B. 2013. Uncontrollable societies of disaffected individuals. Transl D Ross. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Stiegler B. 2019. The age of disruption: technology and madness in computational capitalism. Transl D Ross. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Stiegler B. n.d.. Adaptation-adoption. Ars Industrialis. Available at: https://arsindustrialis.org/adaptation-adoption [accessed on 23 November 2022].

Tazzioli M and Pârvan O. 2021. Technologies of control and infrastructures of redistribution. e-flux 123: 1-12.

Thompson J. 2022. Louis Theroux’s Forbidden America review: a sinister warning about the Far Right. Evening Standard. 14 February. Available at: https://www.standard.co.uk/culture/tvfilm/louis-theroux-forbidden-america-review-bbc-b982090.html [accessed on 23 November 2022].

Tuck E and Ree C. 2013. A glossary of haunting. In: Holman JS, Adams TE and Ellis C (eds). Handbook of autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, Inc.

Published

2022-12-31