The healing-growth future of humanity: regenerative politics and crealectic care


  • Luis de Miranda



pandemic, regenerative politics, crealectics, future, naturing nature, healing growth, Creal


The 2020 coronavirus pandemic served to remind us that despite our Cartesian fantasies of control, naturing nature (natura naturans) is still active in the form of an untamed Other. The dominant reaction on most political sides was anthropocentric: if we do something– a doing generally framed within the scope of technique and management – nature shall go back to the kind and submissive non-viral neutrality that we appreciate in ‘her’ as a supposedly passive resource for productivism. How could humanity – a pandemic species itself and not only metaphorically – be better attuned with the powers of naturing nature, in a posture of co-creation rather than of a reactive technocratic war against the non-periodic or ‘monstrous’ aspects of life? This question is a matter of philosophical health: the future of humanity does not depend on statistics and logistics, but on the possibility of a philosophical (re)generative politics, a trustful care for creative singularity rather than an anxious control and production of regularity. Humanity’s collective health presupposes this reconciliation with naturing nature and the deployment of a global shared cosmology based on the creative healing-growth flux of originative creativity. This regenerative and life-affirming creative Real is here termed ‘Creal’, and we call ‘crealectics’ the generative philosophical health that favours healing growth.


Download data is not yet available.


Assemblée Nationale Française. 2019. Compte-rendu 28, Commission des Affaires Économiques, 11 Décembre 2019.

Bergson H. 1911. Creative evolution. Transl A Mitchell. New York: Holt and Co.

Brown G and Chiek Y. 2016. Leibniz on compossibility and possible worlds. Berlin: Springer Nature.

Cixous H. 2007. Insister of Jacques Derrida. Transl P Kamuf. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Chandler D and Munday R. 2020. Dictionary of social media. Third Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Deleuze G and Guattari F. 1994. What Is philosophy? Transl H Tomlinson and G Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press.

de Miranda L. 2009. Peut-on jouir du capitalisme? Paris: Max Milo.

de Miranda L, Rammamorthy R and Rovatsos R. 2016. We, anthrobot: learning from human forms of interaction and esprit de corps to develop more diverse social robotics. In: Seibt J, Nørskov M, Schack Andersen S (eds). What social robots can and should do. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

de Miranda L. 2017a. Who killed the poet? Transl T Kover. Sacramento: Snuggly Books.

de Miranda L. 2017b. On the concept of creal: the politico-ethical horizon of a creative absolute. In: de Assis P and Giudici P (eds). The dark precursor: Deleuze and artistic research. Louvain: Leuven University Press.

de Miranda L. 2020a. Ensemblance: the transnational genealogy of esprit de corps. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

de Miranda L. 2020b. Artificial intelligence and philosophical creativity: from analytics to crealectics. Human Affairs 30(4): 597-607.

Dempster B. A self-organising systems perspective on planning for sustainability. Waterloo: University of Waterloo.

Domingos P. 2015. The master algorithm. How the quest for the ultimate learning machine will remake our world. New York: Basic Books.

Foucault M. 2004. Naissance de la biopolitique: cours au Collège de France. Paris: Gallimard/Seuil.

Foucault M. 2005. The hermeneutics of the subject. Transl Graham Burchell. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Fukuyama F. 1992. The end of history. New York: Free Press.

Gallie WB. 1956. Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, n.s. 56: 167-198.

Haraway D. 1991. The promises of monsters: a regenerative politics for inappropriate/d Others. In: Grossberg L, Nelson C and Treichler P (eds). Cultural studies. New York: Routledge.

Haraway D. 2016. Staying with the trouble. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Hegel GWF. 1977. Phenomenology of spirit. Transl AV Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hegel GWF. 1981. Lectures on the philosophy of world history. Transl HB Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heidegger M. 1995. The fundamental concepts of metaphysics: world, finitude, solitude. Transl W McNeill and N Walker. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Heidegger M. 1962. Being and time. Transl J Macquarrie and E Robinson. New York: Harper Collins.

Hook D. 2008. Absolute other: Lacan’s “big Other” as adjunct to critical social psychological analysis. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2(1): 51-73.

Horace 1882. The odes and carmen saeculare. Transl J Conington. London: George Bell and Sons.

Howell A. 2011. Madness in international relations: psychology, security, and the global governance of mental health. Oxon and New York: Routledge.

Hunter I. 2015. Secularization: the birth of a modern combat concept. Modern Intellectual History 12(1): 1-32.

Jordan N. 1969. Themes in speculative psychology. London: Tavistock.

Kant I. 1997. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Transl M Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kast FE and Rosenzweig JE. 1972. The modern view: a systems approach in systems behaviour. London: Open University Press.

Lacan J. 1991. L’Envers de la psychanalyse. Le Séminaire Livre XVII. Paris: Seuil.

Lacan J. 1997. The ethics of psychoanalysis, 1950-1960: The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VII. Transl D Porter. New York: Norton.

Lapidge M. 1978. Stoic cosmology. In: J Rist (ed). The Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 182-3.

Manning E and Massumi B. 2015. Thought in the act: passages in the ecology of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Manuel FE and Manuel FP. 1979. Utopian thought in the western world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Marx K and Engels F. 1970. The German ideology. Transl C Arthur. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

Maturana HR and Varela F. 1980. Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.

Mazzú A. 2012. Le soi dans la maladie: considérations à partir de L Binswanger and H Maldiney. Bulletin d’Analyse Phénoménologique 8: 430-441.

Menabrea LF. 1961. Sketch of the analytical engine invented by Charles Babbage. In: Morrison P and Morrison E (eds). Charles Babbage and his calculating engines: selected writings by Charles Babbage and others. New York: Dover.

Merleau-Ponty M. 1968. The visible and the invisible. Transl A Lingis. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Merleau-Ponty M. 2012. Phenomenology of perception. Transl DA Landes. Oxon and New York: Routledge.

Morgan T. 1901. Regeneration. New York: Macmillan.

Morseletto P. 2020. Restorative and regenerative: exploring the concepts in the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology 24 (4): 763-773.

Mumford L. 2010. Technics and civilization. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Nancy JL. 2000. Being singular plural. Stanford: Meridian.

Osborne D and Gaebler T. 1992. Reinventing government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

Pinson J-C. 2013. Poéthique. Une autothéorie. Ceyzérieu: Champ Vallon.

Roe PH, Soulis GN and Handa VK. 1992. The discipline of design. Waterloo: University of Waterloo.

Russel S. 2019. Human compatible: artificial intelligence and the problem of control. New York: Viking.

Schwab K. 2016. The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

Schrödinger E. 1967. What is life? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Simondon G. 2020. Individuation in light of notions of form and information. Transl T Adkins. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Pres

Stark JF. 2018. Perspectives on human regeneration. Palgrave Communications 4, 66.

Toksvig S. 2012. Emanuel Swedenborg: Scientist and mystic. West Chester: Swedenborg Foundation Publishers.

Tolkien JRR. 1954. The riddle of Strider. In: The fellowship of the ring. London: Allen and Unwin.

Turing AM. 1950. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59: 433-460.

Virág C. 2017. The emotions in early chinese philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Whitehead AN. 1929. Process and reality. New York: MacMillan.

Williams H. 2001. Metamorphosis or palingenesis? Political change in Kant. The Review of Politics 63(4): 693-722.