When reason is not enough for social cohesion: rethinking the place of emotion and art in politics

Authors

  • Adeolu Oluwaseyi Oyekan Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18820/24150479/aa54i1/2

Keywords:

reason, art, empathy, emotion

Abstract

Reason has often been defended as critical for the prudent harmonisation of competing interests, security and social cohesion in organised societies. Human rationality however, now appears inadequate to cope with the spate of conflicts and dysfunction in many societies, postcolonial Africa inclusive. Thus, imaginative approaches to fostering social cohesion are required. In this paper, I argue that the dichotomy that elevates reason (equated with logic) and derides emotion (equated with irrationality) is not only misplaced, but also unhelpful. I defend art as a valuable vehicle for creating the dialogic space that fosters empathy, make politics affective and promote social cohesion. I conclude by advocating a complementary integration of reason and emotion, with particular focus on empathy, as a remedy to dysfunctional, antagonistic politics, especially in societies confronted by the complexities of diversity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Appiah KA. 2015. What is the point of college? The New York Times Magazine. 8 September. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/13/magazine/ what-is-the-point-of-college.html [accessed on 2 April 2022].

Astin AW. 2000. The civic challenge of educating the underprepared student. In: T Ehrlich (ed). Civic responsibility and higher education. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education.

Bakhtin MM. 1981. The dialogic imagination: four essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin MM. 1990. Art and answerability: early philosophical essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. https://doi.org/10.7560/704114

Berlin I. 1997. The roots of romanticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Berlin, I. 1990. Alleged relativism in eighteenth-century European thought. In: Hardy H (ed). The crooked timber of humanity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton

University Press.

Bloom P. 2013. The baby in the well: the case against empathy. The New Yorker. May 20. Aailable at: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/05/20/ the-baby-in-the-well [accessed on 2 April 2022].

Bloom P. 2016. Against empathy: the case for rational compassion. New York: Harper Collins.

Chow R. 2006. Age of the world target. Durham and London: Duke University Press. Coplan A and Goldie R. 2011. Introduction. In: Coplan A and Goldie P (eds). Empathy: philosophical and psychological perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University

Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199539956.001.0001 D’Agostino F, Gaus G and Thrasher J. 2019. Contemporary approaches to the social contract. In: Zalta EN (ed). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Available at: https://www.platp.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/

contractarianism-contemporary.

Decety J and Jackson PL. 2006. A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy.

Current Directions in Psychological Science 15(2): 54-58. https://doi.org/

1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00406.x

DeTurk S. 2001. Intercultural empathy: myth, competency, or possibility for

alliance building? Communication Education 50: 374-384. https://doi.

org/10.1080/03634520109379262

Foster SL. 2010. Choreographing empathy: kinesthesia in performance. London

and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203840702

Frank RH. 2001. Cooperation through emotional commitment. In: RM Nesse (ed). Evolution and the capacity for commitment. New York, NY: Russell

Sage Foundation.

Freire P. 1990. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum

Publishing Company.

Freedberg D an Gallese V. 2007. Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic

experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(5): 197-203. https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.003

Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. End of history and the last man. New York: Free Press. Gaus GF. 2003. Contemporary theories of liberalism: public reason as a post-

enlightenmentproject.London:Sage.https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446218754 Gaut B. 2012. Creativity and rationality. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70(3): 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6245.2012.01518.x

Goodwin J, Jasper JM and Polleta F. 2009. Passionate politics: emotions and

social movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Goodwin J, Jasper JM, & Polletta F. 2004. Emotional dimensions of social

movements. David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule, Hanspeter Kriesi (eds). The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 413-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631226697.2003.00019.x

Gray J. 1995. Enlightenment’s wake: politics and culture at the close of the modern age. London: Routledge.

Hawkes J. 2001. The fourth pillar of sustainability: culture’s essential role in public planning. Melbourne: Cultural Development Network in association with Common Ground Publishing.

Hobbes T. 1650. Leviathan. London: Maxfield Publishing Co.

Horkheimer M. 1993. Reason against itself: some remarks on enlightenment.

Theory, Culture & Society. 10(2): 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327

Israel JI. 2011. Democratic enlightenment: philosophy, revolution, and human

rights 1750-1790. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Israel JI. 2006. Enlightenment contested: philosophy, modernity, and the

emancipation of man: 1670-1752. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jacobson GC. 2016. Polarization, gridlock, and presidential campaign politics in 2016. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

(1): 226-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716216658921

D Kalmanowitz and B Lloyd (eds). 2004. Art therapy and political violence: with art, without illusion. London: Brunner-Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203308059

Kant I. 1959. Foundations of the metaphysics of morals. Transl Lewis White Beck. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

Kaplan JT and Lacoboni M. 2006. Getting a grip on other minds: mirror neurons,

intention, understanding, and cognitive empathy. Social Neuroscience

(3/4): 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910600985605

Krensky B. 2001. Going on Beyond Zebra: a middle school and community-based arts organization collaborate for change. Education and Urban Society 33(4): 427-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124501334006

Kukar P. 2018 Against empathy: the case for rational compassion. Philosophical

Psychology 31(3): 479-482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2018.1442923

Lo J. 2016. Diaspora, Art, and Empathy. In: Assmann A and Detmers I (eds). Empathy and its limits. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137552372_12

Locke J. 1980. Second treatise of government. CB Macpherson (ed). Indiana:Hackett.

Loeb PR. 1999. Soul of a citizen: living with conviction in a cynical time. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

Long JW and Brecke P. 2003. War and reconciliation reason and emotion in

conflict resolution. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/ mitpress/7154.001.0001

Lowe S. 2000. Creating community: art for community development. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 29(3): 357-85. https://doi. org/10.1177/089124100129023945

Marcus GE. 2012. Reason, passion, and democratic politics: old conceptions – new understandings – new possibilities. In: Fleming J (ed). Passions and emotions. New York: New York University Press.

McNiff S. 2007. Empathy with the shadow: engaging and transforming difficulties through art. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 47(3): 392-399. https://doi. org/10.1177/0022167807302181

Mill JS. 1991. On liberty. In: Gray J (ed). On liberty and other essays. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mises Ludwig Von. 1985. Liberalism in the classical tradition. San Francisco: Cobden

Mouffe C. 2002. Politics and passions: the stakes of democracy. London: Centre for the Study of Democracy.

Mouffe C. 2008. Art and democracy: art as an agonistic intervention in public space. Open 14: 6-15.

Nardin T. 2015. Rationality in politics and its limits. Global Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Current Affairs and Applied Contemporary Thought 5(2): 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2015.1018693

Nussbaum MC. 1997. Cultivating humanity: a classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi. org/10.2307/j.ctvjghth8

Nussbaum MC. 2010. Not for profit: why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Pancer SM and Pratt MW. 1999. Social and family determinants of community service involvement in Canadian youth. In: Yates M and Youniss J (eds). Roots of civic involvement: international perspectives on community service and activism in youth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 32-55. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511751820.004

Pedwell C. 2013. Affect at the margins: alternative empathies in a small place. Emotion, Space and Society 8: 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. emospa.2012.07.001

Pedwell C. 2014. Affective relations: the transnational politics of empathy. Basingstoke: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137275264

Pedwell C. 2016. De-colonising empathy: thinking affect transnationally. Samyukta: A Journal of Women’s Studies 16(1): 27-49.

Plato. 1989. Symposium. Transl Alexander Nehamas and Paul Woodruff. Indianapolis: Hackett.

Plato. 1992. Republic.Transl GMA Grube, revised CDC Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett.

Povinelli E. 2011. Economies of abandonment: social belonging and endurance in late liberalism. Durham and London: Duke University Press. https://doi. org/10.1515/9780822394570

Rawls J. 1996. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press. Rousseau J-J. 1998. The social contract. Transl HJ Tozer. Ware: Wordsworth Editions Limited.

Schmidt C. 1976. The concept of the political. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Segal E. 2011. Social empathy: a model built on empathy, contextual understanding, and social responsibility that promotes social justice. Journal of Social Service Research 373(3): 266-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/014883 76.2011.564040

Singer T and Steinbeis N. 2009. Differential roles of fairness and compassion- based motivations for cooperation, defection, and punishment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1167: 41-50. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04733.x

Smith A. [1790]. 2006. The theory of moral sentiments. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications Inc.

Snow CP. 2001. The two cultures. London: Cambridge University Press.

Stoker L. 1992. Interests and ethics in politics. American Political Science Review 86(2): 369-382. https://doi.org/10.2307/1964226

Swigonski ME. 1994. The logic of feminist standpoint theory for social work

research. Social Work 39(4): 387-393.

Tinnevelt R. 2005. Contemporary theories of liberalism: public reason as a post-enlightenment project. Acta Politica 40(1): 145-148. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500075

UNESCO. 2011. EFA global monitoring report 2011: the hidden crisis: education and

armed conflict. paris: unesco.

Wallner J. 2019. The death of deliberation: gridlock and the politics of effort in the United States Senate. Washington, DC: Lexington Books.

Published

2022-08-01

Issue

Section

Articles