Propaganda, the public spheres, and the new economic conditions of the digital age
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38140/aa.v57i2.10222Keywords:
surveillance capitalism, misinformation, social media, echo chambers, radicalisationAbstract
The arrival of mobile internet services came with significant promise of a potentially democratic public sphere mediated through digital media technology. However, rather than achieving this promise, these technologies ushered in a new economic age: surveillance capitalism, which revolutionised propaganda and misinformation in ways which pose clear threats to civil order and democratic processes. This paper updates and integrates Jürgen Habermas's model of the public sphere and communicative rationality with the realities of surveillance capitalism's new economic logics and the ways in which they undermine the public sphere. (1) The selective distribution of content by sorting algorithms fosters cultures of insularity and antagonism which (2) fragment and disintegrate the sphere, contributing to the breakdown of public discourse into echo chambers and filter bubbles. Furthermore, (3) sorting algorithms facilitate the evasion of scrutiny as these individually selected messages bypass public attention and criticism. This lack of scrutiny encourages the use of (4) engagement-farming tactics like the use of inflammatory misinformation. This has often led to (5) patterns of migration; wherein users migrate away from the platform to find more corresponding information about the conspiracy or mythology in question – further breaking down public discourse. Lastly, answering the new revenue model's demand for content often results in (6) content from botnets, troll farms, and misinformation networks being platformed and circulated with little to no repercussions.
References
Act-IL. 2019. Upgrade your Israel activism - intro to the new Act-IL app. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=. [accessed on 13 November 2025].
Ahmed I. 2023. Toxic Twitter: how Twitter generates millions in ad revenue by bringing back banned accounts. Centre for Countering Digital Hate. 9 February. Available at: https://counterhate.com [accessed on 13 November 2025].
Amiradakis MJ. 2019. Habermas, mass communication technology and the future of the public sphere. South African Journal of Philosophy 38(2): 149–165.
Andrzejewski C. 2023. "Team Jorge": in the heart of a global disinformation machine. Forbidden Stories. 15 February. Translated from French by A Hylton. Available at: https://forbiddenstories.org [accessed on 13 November 2025].
Argentino MA. 2021. Pastel QAnon. Global Network on Extremism and Technology. 17 March. Available at: https://gnet-research.org [accessed on 13 November 2025].
Centre for Analytics and Behavioural Change. 2020. Farmlands - the making of a misleading 'documentary'. Centre for Analytics and Behavioural Change. 8 December. Available at: https://iono.fm [accessed on 13 November 2025].
Centre for Analytics and Behavioural Change. 2021. Online RET network analysis. Centre for Analytics and Behavioural Change. Available at: https://cabc.org.za [accessed on 13 November 2025].
Centre for Analytics and Behavioural Change. 2021. The dirty dozen and the amplification of incendiary content during the outbreak of unrest in South Africa July 2021. Centre for Analytics and Behavioural Change. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TZV8ZfX1oAXWqFpeGth_fqBSNse2JrxR/view?usp=drive_link [accessed on 13 November 2025].
Dahlgren P. 2005. The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication 22(2): 147–162.
Golin J. 2015. Child advocates mobilize to stop Mattel's eavesdropping "Hello Barbie". Fairplay: Childhood Beyond Brands. 10 March. Available at: https://fairplayforkids.org [accessed on 13 November 2025].
Gorton W. 2016. How microtargeting harms the public sphere. YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=. [accessed on 13 November 2025].
Gu L, Kropotov V and Yarochkin F. 2017. The fake news machine: how propagandists abuse the internet and manipulate the public. Trend Micro. Available at: https://trendmicro.com [accessed on 13 November 2025].
Habermas J. [1962] 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Translated by T Burger. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Iyengar S, Lelkes Y, Levendusky M, Malhotra N and Westwood SJ. 2019. The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science 22: 129-146.
Le Roux J. 2018. Programmatic advertising. Exposed News24. October. Available at: https://news24.com [accessed on 13 November 2025].
Le Roux J. 2018. EXPOSED: the Unisa employee who manufactures fake news to divide SA. Exposed News24. 15 November. Available at: https://news24.com [accessed on 4 August 2022].
Mellers BA, Schwartz A, Ho K and Ritov I. 1997. Decision affect theory: emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychological Science 8(6): 423-429.
Mozur P. 2018. A genocide incited on Facebook, with posts from Myanmar's military. New York Times. 15 October. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/15/technology/myanmar-facebook-genocide.html [accessed on 13 November 2025].
Munn L. 2019. Alt-right pipeline: individual journeys to extremism online. First Monday 24(6). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i6.10108
Mylonas Y. 2023. On the proletarian public sphere and its contemporaneity: crises, class and the media. Acta Academica 55(2): 111–130.
Pariser E. 2011. The filter bubble: what the internet is hiding from you. United Kingdom: Penguin.
Reuters. 2024. Ex-Meta employee claims firing was due to Gaza content handling. The Jerusalem Post. 5 June. Available at: https://www.jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/article-805046 [accessed on 13 November 2025].
Slovic P, Finucane MP, Peters E and MacGregor DG. 2007. The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research 177(3): 1333-1352.
Southern L. 2018. Farmlands [documentary film]. 25 June. Available at: https://youtube.com [accessed on 13 November 2025].
Strydom A. 2017. Manufacturing divides: the Gupta-linked radical economic transformation (RET) media network. African Network of Centres for Investigative Reporting. Available at: https://sourceafrica.net [accessed on 13 November 2025].
Thiel P. 2009. The education of a libertarian. Cato Unbound. 13 April. Available at: https://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/04/13/peter-thiel/the-education-of-a-libertarian/ [accessed on 13 November 2025].
United States of America. 104th United States Congress. 1996. Section 23 Communications Decency Act of 1996. Protection for 'good samaritan' blocking and screening of offensive material.
VICE News. 2021. This lifestyle influencer lost her accounts because of QAnon. VICE News. 22 February. Available at: https://youtube.com [accessed on 13 November 2025].
Wilson S. 2020. The wellness realm has fallen into conspiritualism – I have a sense why. The Guardian. 14 September. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com [accessed on 13 November 2025].
Wylie C. 2019. Mindfck: inside Cambridge Analytica's plot to break the world*. London: Profile Books.
Zuboff S. 2019. The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. London: Profile Books.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmad Jamal, Prof. Anthony Collins

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


